ABSTRACT
Lung transplantation (LTx) had been the only survival option in selected Covid-19 infected ARDS patients. We evaluated surgical outcome in such group from multi-center ECLS study. LTx patient data (n=1488)were collected from multiple institutions through the National ECLS Registry and was stratified on presence of COVID-19 infection. LTx procedure details, patient demographics and post-operative outcomes were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients along with pre-op ECMO vs. no ECMO COVID-19 patients using Wilcoxon rank sum test or Chi-square testing to determine distribution. Time to 30-day post-operative survival was analyzed in combination with Kaplan-Meier survival curves with log-rank testing to assess mortality in these groups of patients. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Out of 1488 LTx patients, our results included a total of 34 patients infected with COVID-19 at time of LTx. When compared between covid LTx (n=34) vs. non-covid LTx (n=1,454), demographic data revealed significant differences in tracheostomy (p=0.0001), lung allocation score (p=0.0001), type of pre-op ECMO support (p=0.0001), type of ECMO support (p=0.001), conversion (p=0.006), and ventilator support time (p=0.0001);but no significant differences in gender (p=0.30), BMI (p=0.32), EVLP (p=0.078), PGD score at T24 (p=0.13), and waitlist time (p=0.75). 30-day post-operative mortality analysis showed K-M graph with no statistical significance (p=0.41) in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. In addition, we compared pre-ECMO utilized COVID-19 patients (n=21) vs. non-ECMO utilized COVID-19 patients (n=13) who were transplanted. Covid-19 infected patients when transplanted showed no significant differences in survival. Propensity score matched study indicated similar results. Selective ARDS patients may benefit from end-stage surgical options like lung transplantation. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Background: Lung transplantation (LTx) has been demonstrated to be a feasible therapy in patients with irreversible lung injury due to SARS-CoV-2. Aim of this retrospective study was to present our experience with LTx in SARS-CoV-2 patients. Method(s): Records of the 136 patients who underwent LTx between January 2021 and August 2022 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. LTx was performed in SARS-CoV-2 patients who showed radiological evidence of irreversible lung failure, after failed attempts of weaning off mechanical ventilation (MV) and ECMO;showed single-organ dysfunction;were SARS-CoV-2 negative, preferably <65 years old and awake under MV and ECMO support. Graft survival was compared between COVID-19 LTx patients and contemporary patients transplanted for other indications. Median follow-up amounted to 7.6 (5.2-14.5) months. Result(s): Among the 79 patients with SARS-CoV-2 lung failure referred for LTx, 9 (11%) patients were listed, 8 of them being transplanted between January 2021 and August 2022. One patient died while on the waiting list. All were on MV and ECMO support (awake in 6 cases) for a median ECMO support time of 75 (38.5-152.8) days. Four (50%) patients were male and median age was 52 (37-57) years. All patients underwent bilateral LTx on ECMO support that was weaned off in all patients at the end of Tx. After LTx, 2 (25%) patients showed a primary graft dysfunction (PGD) score grade 3 at 72 hours and required reinstitution of veno-venous (n = 1) and veno-arterial (n = 1) ECMO support that was successfully weaned after 7 and 6 days, respectively. One patient (12.5%) required rethoracotomy for bleeding, and two (25%) patients required new hemodialysis treatment, with recovery of renal function in all patients. Median MV time amounted to 8 days (1-30), median intensive care unit stay to 19 (13-26) days, and median hospital stay to 91 (62-103) days. No patient died in-hospital. At 1-year follow-up, graft survival was 100% in SARS-CoV-2 LTx patients and 95% for patients (n = 128) transplanted for other indications (p = 0.539). Conclusion(s): Lung transplantation in highly selected SARS-CoV-2 patients yielded excellent posttransplant results. Graft survival was comparable between patients transplanted for SARS-COV-2 pneumonia and patients transplanted for other indications. A multidisciplinary approach is of paramount importance to successfully bridge these patients to transplantation and to guarantee a complete patient functional recovery after transplantation.
ABSTRACT
Patients with end-stage lung diseases on the MHH waiting list for lung transplantation (LTx) have been vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with usually three doses of the mRNA vaccine. Hence, they are supposed to develop robust antibody and T cell responses when immunized prior to LTx without the influence of immunosuppression. Therefore, we hypothesized the induction of high spike-specific IgG levels and protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19. To proof this, we aimed to analyze the IgG levels specific for the spike S1-, RBD- and S2-domains in patients on a waiting list (WL-LTx) longitudinally before and after their transplantation. Plasma obtained pre (n=70) and post LTx (n=28) of WL-LTx patients was analyzed for spike-specific IgG by Luminex-based multiplex assays. The threshold for positivity was set separately for each spike domain based on the median MFI +2σ in a healthy, unexposed pre-pandemic control group. Patients with previous SARS-CoV-2-infection were excluded. 95.7% of WL-LTx patients had seroconverted for either RBD-, S1- or S2-specific IgG pre LTx and still 92.86% were positive post LTx. Overall, S1-, S2- and RBD-specific IgG MFI values did not significantly differ between pre vs. post LTx. A subanalysis of matched plasma samples (n=25) revealed that 52% of the WL-LTx patients showed a higher IgG response pre than post LTx for all three spike protein domains and 28% showed even elevated antibody levels post LTx. Interestingly, S2-specific IgG MFI values were significantly elevated compared to RBD-specific IgG MFI values, both pre (S2 vs. RBD p<0.0001) and post LTx (S2 vs. RBD p=0.0225). The majority of WL-LTx patients mounted high SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG responses following vaccination pre LTx. Based on the more efficient antibody production against the S2-domain compared to RBD- and S1-domains, S2-specific IgG responses should be included also in the general evaluation of humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2. As expected, WL-LTx patients showed a superior antibody response to vaccination compared to LTx-recipients vaccinated only after LTx, which could even be maintained after LTx in some patients. Therefore, both patients on waiting list and LTx recipients may benefit from additional booster vaccinations after LTx. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)